22, as the agency has said will happen. The lawsuit, filed in Ramsey County District Court, also seeks unspecified damages and attorney fees. When the Health Department sought manufacturers following passage of a 2014 medical marijuana law, the agency asked for extensive information from companies bidding for state certification. They were required to provide details about cultivation, extraction methods, pricing, building blueprints and security plans, ownership structure and compensation agreements with executives and investors. The lawsuit contends that disclosure of application details even after promised redactions are made could negatively impact the reputation of investors and provide an unjust informational windfall to competitors that wish to tarnish such principals/investors market and thought leadership. Bill Pentelovitch, an attorney for BHC, had no comment Monday beyond the court filings. The Department of Health didnt provide immediate comment. In planning for the information release, the Health Department has relied on an advisory opinion provided in April by the Department of Administration, which is also a defendant in the case. The nonbinding opinion determined that applications submitted by manufacturers were presumptively public once any manufacturers were registered with the state. Trade secret and security information were deemed the sole exceptions. Only two of the 12 applicants were ultimately chosen to cultivate marijuana and convert it into the pill, oil or vapor forms allowed for sale to patients with qualifying conditions. Producers arent allowed to sell it in leaf form for smoking.